The petitioner was answerable for his individual predicament. In the event the petitioner was dissatisfied Together with the judgment during the match, he ought to have used the legal suitable of charm as an alternative to forfeiting that alternative and resorting to a belated application less than Section 151, C. https://cybercrimelawyerindhakara09474.designi1.com/53583701/the-definitive-guide-to-qanun-e-shahadat-in-dha-karachi-pakistan